Showing posts with label veterinary oncology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label veterinary oncology. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Bounce


Bailey bounced into the hospital waiting room with an exuberance that I have not seen in months.  Freed from the grasp of arthritis and constricted blood flow, she has been so energetic and enthusiastic the last couple of weeks, since starting on the doggie equivalent to Ibuprofen. She raced to the 7-year-old Burmese who greeted her politely, but declined her invitation to dance.  The Burmese had completed its course of traditional chemotherapy, and was now starting metronomic oral chemo (two of the options I would soon be offered for Bailey).  Onto the Dachshund-Beagle-Chihuahua (?) mix—no, there is no play to be had here either.  How about the Rottie-mix with the wagging tail and the telltale injection sites?  A pleasant if uninspired sniff, but nothing more.
Image of Bailey Playing
Bailey playing (Sunday 26-Jan-13)

The humans were far more responsive as Bailey shifted her sights to the receptionists, techs, nurses and vets.  Hugs and smiles and verbal greetings in high-pitched voices were freely given as Bailey exploded into their arms.  She was feeling more than well, more than happy and far more than comfortable.  She was thrilled.  She was enthused.  She was exuberant as she bounced from one person to the next. 

Palliative.  Such a nice sounding word.  Gentle and kind.  Palliative--downright palatable.  But I was about to discover the different shades of palliative care, some of which are less kind and much more aggressive.  And which approach is kinder is not a priori to the concept of palliative care, but is a judgment you make—no, a judgement I had to make.  And in a race with a very aggressive, very fast cancer, I had to make it soon.

I had thought the choice would be between comfort and duration, but I was wrong.  Most of the approaches that offer the best (although small) chance of extending Bailey’s life, would likely keep her comfortable, or at least be tolerable--as in “tolerated reasonably well.”  All of the chemo-dogs we encountered seemed comfortable and even happy.  Their humans reported little signs of pain, a satisfactory quality of life, and only some ill effects from the therapy.  I could keep Bailey comfortable and provide a chance (although a small chance) of extending her life a few weeks.

Image of Bailey Playing
Bailey Playing (Sunday 26-Jan-13)
It was now clear that the choice was not between duration and comfort—they are on the same side.  The actual choice is between duration and joy, between rolling and bouncing.

Is it better to bounce highly and freely for a shorter time, or to roll slowly and calmly for a longer course?  Is it better to bounce and bounce and bounce until you suddenly drop and deflate with a frightening, likely painful, but rapid thud? Or, would it be better to roll on a course of leveled ground, watching the surroundings slowly pass by, and losing speed as you gradually deflate with only minor discomfort until someone kindly ends it for you? Is it better to extract every sap of joy from a fewer moments, greeting each with all the exuberance you have, or to more calmly receive some unknown number of additional gentle moments, appreciating and feeling satisfied with each.

Struggling to keep up with Bailey as she bounded about the hospital waiting room, the choice became clear.  Realizing that this is how she had always lived her life, that this is how she always approached each new situation, the answer also became clear.  We will bounce.  We will bounce highly and freely and wildly and exuberantly until Bailey has no bounce left.  I will occasionally fear the thud that I know could come with any of the next bounces and without any foretelling, but I will then catch my breath, dry my tears, throw out my arms and bounce again with my very exuberant, very happy dog. 

Image of Bailey Playing
Bailey Playing (Sunday 26-Jan-13)
So, thank you, but no to chemotherapy. No thank you to a satisfactory quality of life. No to reasonably tolerate. And, with great sadness, no to the 30% chance for a few more weeks of gentle rolling.  For a more reserved dog that choice might be ultimately right, but not for Bailey.  I choose to allow her to be exuberant without moderation; to get excited by the stupidest things; to explode into each new situation with unbounded joy.  I choose to watch her bounce with glee until there is no more bounce in her.  And I will be right there throughout, bouncing with her.

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

The Power of Small Integers


An integer is a very powerful thing. Plain and whole, it is solid and clear with none of the vagueness of some non-integers (such as Pi).  It leaves no question, it provides no false sense, it allows no myth or delusion. When it is a small integer, it is concrete and immediate; cold, hard fact. And when it is so small it can be counted with just a few fingers (or less), it is usually bad.  Today I received three such integers.

1 – the number of months for which I should prepare myself.  Turns out that the murmur and arrhythmia that I thought we would manage medically were signposts, but not the problem.  It is the tumor on Bailey’s heart causing the arrhythmia.  The inoperable tumor.  The inoperable blood vessel tumor which, if malignant will spread very quickly to other systems, or cause her to bleed out even if benign. 

3 – the maximum number of months Bailey might live if I pursue no oncological treatment and if we are lucky.

3 – pending further consultation from an oncologist, the maximum number of months that Bailey’s life might be extended with chemotherapy.

These are very small integers.  These are very, very powerful integers.